Parliamentary Privileges in Indian Governance System: Role Of Free Speech in Promoting Transparency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60143/ijls.v5.i1.2019.31Keywords:
No keywords.Abstract
No abstract
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Hajare, Shashikant The law of parliamentary privileges in India: problems and prospects, Sodhganga (Oct. 30, 2018 10:04 AM) shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/52360/12/12_chapter%205.pdf.
V Razdan, Parliamentary privileges in India: separation of powers, Sodhganga (Oct. 30, 2018 10:04 AM) www.shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/8783/4/04_preface.pdf.
DALIP SINGH, Parliamentary Privileges In India, 26 IJPS, No. 1 76, 75-85 (1965).
Id at 78.
INDIA CONST. art. 105, cl. 1.
INDIA CONST. art. 105.
Id.
INDIA CONST. art. 105, cl. 1.
INDIA CONST. art. 105, cl. 2.
INDIA CONST. art.361A.
INDIA CONST. art.361A, cl. 1, proviso.
§135A of Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908, No. 5, Acts of Parliament, 1908 (India).
Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, 1952 (Aug. 13, 2021, 02:05 PM) http://164.100.47.194 › RULES-2010-P-FINAL_1
SUBHASH C. KASHYAP, OUR PARLIAMENT 234-36 (National Book Trust 1995).
§§ 229 and 230 of Rules of procedure and conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, 1952
Kashyap, supra note 15 at 236
supra note 16, §§ 232 and 233.
Id § 252
Id §§ Rules 269 and 270
Id § 272
Id § 275
Id § 249
Id § 248
ERSKINE MAY, PARLIAMENTARY PRACTICE 115 (21st ed., 1989).
M.P. JAIN, INDIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 66 (8th ed. 2018).
Id at 68.
AIR 1965 SC 745; This reference was a continuation of the death of a request by a phenomenal Full Seat of 28 Appointed authorities, remaining, under Article 226, the execution of the U.P. Gathering Goal requesting two Appointed authorities of the Allahabad High Court to be brought into care before the Bar of the House to clarify why they ought not be rebuffed for the scorn of the House. The two Appointed authorities had conceded the habeas corpus request and allowed bail to Mr. Kesava Singh who was going through detainment in compatibility of the Gathering Goal pronouncing him blameworthy of the break of advantage. The goal of the Get together and the stay request gave by the Full Seat brought about an established impasse. Therefore, the President alluded the matter under Article 143 to the High Court for its viewpoint.
INDIA CONST. art. 118, cl. 1.
§ 373, Rules of procedure and conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, 1952.
Id. § 374.
Id. § 380.
INDIA CONST. art. 121.
Singh, supra note 5.
Gunupaty Keshavram Reddy v. Nafisul Hassan AIR 1954 SC 636; MSM Sharma v. Shri Krishna AIR 1959, SC 365.
M. V. Pylee, Free Speech and Parliamentary Privileges in India, 35 Pacific Affairs, 13, 11-23 (1962).
Dr K. Madhusudhana Rao, Codification of Parliamentary Privileges in India - Some Suggestions, (2001) 7 SCC (Jour) 21.
Id.
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 455 OF 2015.
Subodh Asthana, Parliamentary Privileges in India, iPleaders (Jul. 23, 2018, 02:05 PM) https://blog.ipleaders.in/parliamentary-priviledges/#Misuse_of_Parliamentary_Privileges.
AIR 1958 SC 468.
NCRWC Report, 2002 (Jul. 23, 2018, 02:05 PM) https://legalaffairs.gov.in/ncrwc-report
Dr. Jyoti Dharm and Mr. Gaurav Deswal, Parliamentary Privileges In India: A Comprehensive Study, 3 BLR 177, 172-177 (2016).
Alliance University
