Judicial Review of Legislative Actions: A Study With Reference to the Principles Formulated by the Indian Judiciary in the Context of Judicial Review of Amending Power of the Parliament.

Authors

  • Sanjay Bang Reader of Law at Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration, Mussoorie, Uttarakhand.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60143/ijls.v2.i1.2016.43

Abstract

No Abstract.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-11

How to Cite

Bang, S. (2023). Judicial Review of Legislative Actions: A Study With Reference to the Principles Formulated by the Indian Judiciary in the Context of Judicial Review of Amending Power of the Parliament. International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.60143/ijls.v2.i1.2016.43

Issue

Volume 2, Issue 1, 2016

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

The Author is Reader of Law at Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration, Mussoorie, Uttarakhand. The Author can be reached at sanjaysbang27@gmail.com

The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Institutions, (1987), page 142.

(AIR 1997 SC 1125)

Ferguson & McHenry: The American Federal Government, Ed. X,, p. 12

Abraham: ‘The Judicial Process’, page 251

5 US(Cranch)137(1803)

AIR 1970 SC 424

G. N. Joshi: Aspects of Indian Constitutional Law, p. 218

1952 AIR 366,1952 SCR 1112

Smt. Bella Banerjee v. the State of West Bengal, 1954 SCR 558

1962AIR 159,1962 SCR (3) 146

Bengal Immunity Company v. The State of Bihar, AIR 1955 SC 661.

Smt.Bella Bannerji and others v. The State of West Bengal, 1954 SCR 558.

A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras AIR 1950 SC 27

AIR 1967 SC 1461

I. C. Golaknath & Ors vs State of Punjab & Anrs 1967 AIR 1643

The Superintendent and Legal Remembrancer Stale of West Bengal v.The Corporation at Calcutta, [1967] 2 S.C.R., 170

[805 E; 807 E, G; 808 C-D] Great Northern Railway v. Sunburst Oil & Ref. Co. (1932) 287 U.S. 358: 77 L. Ed. 360, Chicot County Drainage v. Baxter State Bank, (1940) 308 U.S. 371, Griffin v. Illionis, (1956) 351 U.S. 12, Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 : 193 L. Ed. 872, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 : 6 L. Ed. (2nd Edn.) 1081 and Link letter v. Walker, (1965) 381 U.S. 618,

Sukhdev v. Bhagatram AIR 1975 SC 1231

State of Mysore v. Bhat AIR 1975 SC 596

AIR 1950 SC 41

1951 AIR 318, 1951 SCR 682

AIR 1960 SC 554.

U. N. R. Rao v. Indira Gandhi, AIR 1971 SC 1002

1951 AIR 458,1952 SCR 89