Domain Name Disputes and the Rising Threat of Cybersquatters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60143/ijls.v6.i1.2020.61Keywords:
No keywords.Abstract
No abstract
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Michael D. Scott, Advertising in Cyberspace: Business and Legal Considerations, COMPUTER LAW., 1 (1995).
Sally M. Abel, Trademark Issues in Cyberspace: The Brave New Frontier, MICH. TELECOMM. & TECH. L. REV., (1999).
Bonifaz, Monica. Domain names, Internet and Trademarks, infringements in cyberspace, PAPER REVIEW, (2015).
Froomkin, A., The collision of trademarks, domain names, and due process in cyberspace, COMMUN. ACM. , (2001).
Pope, Michael & Warkentin, Merrill & Mutchler, Leigh & Luo, Robert, The Domain Name System: Past, Present, and Future, COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, (2012).
Richard L. Baum and Robert C. Combow, First Use Test in Internet Domain Name Disputes, NATL. LJ 30, (1996).
Jonathan Anschell & John J Lucas, What’s in a Name: Dealing with Cybersquatting, ENT. & SPORTS LAW 3rd edn., (2003).
Manish Vij v Indra Chugh, [2002] AIR Del 243.
Jordan A. Arnot, Navigating Cybersquatting Enforcement in the Expanding Internet, J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L., 13th edn., (2014).
Dara B. Gilwit, The Latest Cybersquatting Trend: Typosquatters, Their Changing Tactics, and How to Prevent Public Deception and Trademark Infringement, WASH. U. J. L. & POL’Y 11th edn., (2003).
RASTOGI ANIRUDH, CYBER LAW, LAW OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INTERNET (Lexis Nexis 2014).
Sankalp Jain, Cyber Squatting: Concept, Types and Legal Regimes in India & USA, SSRN ELECTRONIC JOURNAL, (2015).
THE HISTORY OF ICANN,https://www.icann.org/history#:~:text=ICANN%20was%20founded%20in%201998,the%20U.S.%20with%20gl obal%20participation (last visited on 14 September 2020).
UNIFORM DOMAIN-NAME DISPUTE-RESOLUTION POLICY, https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/help/dndr/udrp-en (last visited on 14 September 2020).
Zohaib Hasan Khan, Cybersquatting and its Effectual Position in India, Vol. 6 Issue 2, IJ SCIENTIFIC & ENGINEERING RESEARCH, (2015).
ICANN, LIST OF APPROVED DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICE PROVIDERS, https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/providers-6d-2012-02-25-en (last visited on 14 September 2020).
UNIFORM DOMAIN DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY, https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/policy-2012-02-25-en (last visited on 14 September 2020).
THE UNIFORM DOMAIN DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY, https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/policy-2012-02-25-en (last visited on 14 September 2020).
World Wrestling Federation Entertainment, Inc. v Michael Bosman, [2000] WIPO, Case no. D99-0001.
Philip Morris Incorporated v. r9.net, [2003] WIPO Case no. D2003-0004.
Doug Isenberg, These Countries have adopted the UDRP, GIGALAW, (2017) https://giga.law/blog/2017/5/23/these-countries-have-adopted-the-udrp (last visited on 13 September 2020).
Jayakar, Krishna & Patricia, India’s Domain Name Dispute Resolution Process: An Empirical Investigation, SSRN E-J, (2012).
Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions (P) Ltd., [2004] (3) AWC 2366 SC
Yahoo! Inc. v. Akash Arora & Anr., [1999] IIAD Delhi 229
Rediff Communication v Cyberbooth & Anr., [2000] AIR Bombay 27
Acqua Minerals Ltd. v Mr. Pramod Borse & Anr., [2001] AIR Delhi 463
Trademark Act, 1999, §103.
Dana Kerr, Pinterest wins $7.2M in legal battle with cybersquatter, (CNET, 30 Sept 2013) https://www.cnet.com/news/pinterest-wins-7-2m-in-legal-battle-with-cybersquatter/ ( last visited on 05 September 2020)
Philippines: Analysis of the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, CENTRE FOR LAW AND DEMOCRACY, (Nov. 2012).
Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d).
Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d) (1)
WIPO, Cybersquatting Cases Reach New Record in 2017, Geneva, (Mar. 14, 2018), http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2018/article_0001.html (last visited on11 September 2020). 35 Id.
Commercial IP Suit [2019] (L) NO.577.
WIPO, Cybersquatting Case Filing Surges During COVID-19 Crisis, [June 2020], https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/news/2020/cybersquatting_covid19.html ( last visited on 10 September 2020).
Janos Szurdi, Cybersquatting, [September, 2020] https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/cybersquatting/
Trademark Act, 1999, §103.
Anti-cyber squatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), 1999
WIPO, Cybersquatting Case Filing Surges During COVID-19 Crisis, [June 2020], https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/news/2020/cybersquatting_covid19.html (last visited on
Alliance University
